
Loading…

Loading…

Features, pricing and Editor Score side by side — to help you pick the right coding & development tool in 2026.
Quick verdict
On our Editor Score, Amp and Cursor land almost level. Pick Amp if you want deep codebase context from Sourcegraph; choose Cursor for codebase-aware chat. On pricing, both ship a free or freemium tier, so you can try each before paying.
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Free tier | ||
| Best for | deep codebase context from Sourcegraph | codebase-aware chat |
Frontier agentic coding tool by Sourcegraph
The AI-first code editor built for pair programming
Choose Amp if…
Choose Cursor if…
Your use case decides this one: Amp leans into deep codebase context from Sourcegraph, while Cursor is built for codebase-aware chat. Weigh features and pricing for your workflow. Both have a free or freemium tier, so spin up each and keep the one that clicks.
Neither is universally better — it depends on your budget and which features matter most. The side-by-side breakdown above shows where each one wins.
Amp (freemium) is best for deep codebase context from Sourcegraph, while Cursor (freemium) is best for codebase-aware chat. See the full feature and pricing comparison above.
Both have paid plans — pricing depends on your usage tier. Open each tool's review for current prices, and watch for free trials.
Amp is usually the easier starting point thanks to a lower barrier to entry. Beginners should favour a free tier and a simple interface over raw power.
Other head-to-heads in the same category.
Senior AI Tools Reviewer
Daniel reviews AI tools the slow way — by actually using them on real projects. His reviews cover what works, what breaks, and who each tool is genuinely a good fit for.
AI Guides & Tutorials Lead
Ethan writes hands-on, step-by-step guides that turn complex AI workflows into something anyone can follow. He focuses on practical setups, prompts, and getting real results from everyday tools.
Keep exploring
Last updated August 2026. Comparisons are ranked by our Editor Score (features, value and pricing, blended with verified user reviews where a tool has them) — see our methodology.