Auphonic vs Async
Auphonic and Async compared on features, pricing and Editor Score — to help you pick the right video & audio tool in 2026.
Quick verdict
Auphonic and Async score within a fraction of each other on our Editor Score. Pick Auphonic if you want intelligent levelling; choose Async for conversational editing that removes filler, pauses, repeats and bad takes. On pricing, each has a free or freemium plan, so cost isn't the deciding factor here.
Auphonic vs Async at a Glance
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| Free tier | ||
| Best for | intelligent levelling | conversational editing that removes filler, pauses, repeats and bad takes |
Auphonic
Auphonic is an AI audio post-production service that automatically balances levels, reduces noise and reverb, removes filler words and silences, meets loudness targets, mixes multitrack recordings, transcribes speech and publishes results, via web app, API, CLI and integrations.
- Broadcast-quality polish without an engineer
- Standards-compliant loudness
- Removes tedious editing
- Automation-friendly API and integrations
- Cannot rescue very poor recordings
- Not for music mastering
- Less manual control than a DAW
Async
Async is the platform formerly known as Podcastle, rebranded in January 2026. It edits video and audio through conversational prompts: removing filler and bad takes, cleaning audio with Magic Dust, generating B-roll, dubbing, lipsync and voice cloning, across Async Studio and Async API.
- The rebrand preserved accounts, projects, pricing and billing rather than breaking them
- Conversational editing is genuinely faster for coarse work and open to non-editors
- Years of speech heritage show in the audio tooling, which is where most video fails
- Studio and API let the same models serve creators and developers
- Anyone arriving from an old bookmark or tutorial is looking for a product that no longer exists by that name
- Chat is the wrong interface for frame-accurate or aesthetic edits
- A podcaster who wanted a podcast tool now owns a broader platform
Which Should You Choose?
Choose Auphonic if…
- you want intelligent levelling
- a free or freemium plan is important
Choose Async if…
- you want conversational editing that removes filler, pauses, repeats and bad takes
- a free or freemium plan is important
Auphonic vs Async: The Verdict
There's no one-size answer here: Auphonic leans into intelligent levelling, while Async is built for conversational editing that removes filler, pauses, repeats and bad takes. Weigh features and pricing for your workflow. Both have a free or freemium tier, so spin up each and keep the one that clicks.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Auphonic better than Async?
Neither is universally better — it depends on your budget and which features matter most. The side-by-side breakdown above shows where each one wins.
What is the difference between Auphonic and Async?
Auphonic (freemium) is best for intelligent levelling, while Async (freemium) is best for conversational editing that removes filler, pauses, repeats and bad takes. See the full feature and pricing comparison above.
Is Auphonic or Async cheaper?
Both have paid plans — pricing depends on your usage tier. Open each tool's review for current prices, and watch for free trials.
Which is better for beginners, Auphonic or Async?
Auphonic is usually the easier starting point thanks to a lower barrier to entry. Beginners should favour a free tier and a simple interface over raw power.
More Video & Audio Comparisons
Other head-to-heads in the same category.
About the Authors
AI Tools Comparison Analyst
Olivia runs side-by-side comparisons and benchmarks, digging into pricing, features, and real-world performance so readers can choose between competing AI tools with confidence.
Senior AI Tools Reviewer
Daniel reviews AI tools the slow way — by actually using them on real projects. His reviews cover what works, what breaks, and who each tool is genuinely a good fit for.
Keep exploring
Last updated October 2026. Comparisons are ranked by our Editor Score (features, value and pricing, blended with verified user reviews where a tool has them) — see our methodology.