Cleanvoice AI cleans podcast and video audio automatically: filler words, background noise, mouth sounds, breaths, stutters and dead air. It exports an editable timeline back to Audition, Reaper, DaVinci Resolve and Audacity rather than locking you into its own editor.
Auphonic
Auphonic is an AI audio post-production service that automatically balances levels, reduces noise and reverb, removes filler words and silences, meets loudness targets, mixes multitrack recordings, transcribes speech and publishes results, via web app, API, CLI and integrations.
Professional-sounding audio usually needs a sound engineer: balancing voices, removing noise, hitting loudness standards and exporting correctly. Auphonic automates that work, which is why it has long been popular with podcasters and radio producers.
You drop in an audio or video file and Auphonic levels speakers and music, reduces noise and reverb, cuts filler words and silences, meets loudness targets, mixes multiple tracks, transcribes and publishes. It sits among audio tools like AudioCleaner AI, with a deeper, standards-focused post-production pipeline.
This review covers what Auphonic does to a recording, which podcasters and producers it suits, how it prices processing time, and when it is not the fix you need.
Auphonic Audio-Engineer Facts
| What it is | An AI audio post-production service |
|---|---|
| Levelling | Balances speakers, music and speech automatically |
| Cleanup | Noise and reverb reduction, de-esser, de-plosive |
| Editing | Cuts filler words, coughs and silences |
| Standards | Loudness targets, true peak and more |
| Multitrack | Ducking, noise gate, mic-bleed removal |
| Extras | Speech-to-text, show notes, chapters, publishing |
| Access | Free monthly processing hours, then paid |
Auphonic, The Sound-Polish Brief
- Auphonic is an automatic sound engineer: upload audio or video and it levels, cleans and finishes it.
- It covers the whole post chain: noise and reverb reduction, filler and silence cuts, loudness targets and multitrack mixing.
- It adds publishing and transcripts: speech-to-text, show notes, chapters and automatic distribution.
- It polishes, it does not fix everything: badly recorded audio improves but cannot match a well-recorded source.
An Automatic Sound Engineer For Podcasts And Video
Auphonic's purpose is to give non-engineers broadcast-quality audio with almost no effort. You upload a file, choose a preset or a few settings, and its algorithms handle the work a sound engineer would normally do.
Its intelligent leveller balances loudness between speakers, music and speech without you needing to understand compressors, while noise and reverb reduction, de-essing, de-plosive filtering and clipping repair clean up common recording problems.
It also handles the tedious editing many podcasters dread, automatically cutting silences, coughs and filler words in several languages, and it can process multitrack recordings with automatic ducking, noise gating and mic-bleed removal.
The honest framing is that Auphonic is excellent at polishing and standardising audio, but it cannot work miracles. A good microphone and a quiet room still matter, and heavily damaged recordings will improve rather than sound truly professional.
Auphonic is excellent at polishing and standardising audio, but a good microphone and a quiet room still matter.
What Does Auphonic Do To A Recording?
Auphonic's pipeline runs from cleaning and levelling to standards compliance, transcription and distribution.
Levelling, Noise Reduction And Filler Cuts
Auphonic balances levels, reduces static or fast-changing noise, removes reverb, filters harsh frequencies and repairs clipping, then cuts filler words and silences. For many shows, that alone removes most of the editing burden.
For mastering music rather than speech, a platform like LANDR is the specialist; Auphonic's strength is spoken-word and mixed speech-and-music content.
Loudness Targets, Transcripts And Publishing
You can set target loudness, true peak limits and other specifications so episodes stay consistent and meet platform or broadcast standards. Auphonic also produces multilingual speech-to-text with automatic show notes and chapters, creates video podcasts with audiograms and subtitles, and publishes to platforms such as YouTube and podcast hosts.
For transcription at scale inside your own products, a speech-to-text API like AssemblyAI is built for developers; Auphonic includes transcripts as part of finishing an episode.
Which Podcasters And Producers Auphonic Suits
Auphonic suits podcasters, radio and broadcast producers, video creators, educators and organisations that publish spoken-word content regularly and want consistent, standards-compliant sound without hiring an engineer.
It suits teams that automate production, since watch folders, an API, a command-line tool and Zapier integration let it slot into existing workflows and process files without manual uploads.
It suits less well music production and mastering, sound design, or anyone who wants fine-grained manual control over every edit, where a digital audio workstation and an engineer are better.
It also cannot rescue recordings that are fundamentally poor; improving the source, with better microphones and quieter rooms, gives Auphonic much better material to work with.
For most spoken-word creators, the realistic outcome is a dramatic improvement in consistency and polish for very little effort, which is exactly the job most shows need done.
How Auphonic Prices Processing Hours
Auphonic offers a number of free processing hours each month, with paid plans and one-time credits for more processing time. We do not publish prices, which change; check the site.
Because pricing is based on processing time, the value is easy to model: estimate your monthly hours of audio and compare that with the cost of editing time or a freelance engineer.
For many podcasters the free allowance covers a light schedule, while weekly shows, multi-show networks and broadcasters will usually need a paid plan or credits.
The sensible approach is to run a few real episodes through the free hours, compare the results with your current process, and only then choose a plan that matches your actual monthly volume.
Networks and agencies running several shows should also check how processing hours are shared across users and productions, since multiple weekly shows can use up an allowance much faster than a single podcaster expects.
Processing One Episode Through Auphonic
Because Auphonic's value shows on real episodes, test it on recordings you already know well.
- Upload a typical episode, ideally one with some noise or uneven levels.
- Choose loudness targets that match your platforms.
- Enable filler-word and silence cutting and review what was removed.
- Try multitrack processing if you record speakers separately.
- Check the transcript, show notes and chapters for accuracy.
- Pass/fail: Auphonic is worth it if episodes sound better with far less editing time.
- Improve your recording setup too; better input gives better output.
Auphonic Audio Terms
- Loudness normalisation
- Adjusting audio to a target perceived loudness so episodes sound consistent across platforms.
- True peak
- The maximum level of the audio waveform after conversion, limited to avoid distortion on playback.
- Ducking
- Automatically lowering music or another track when someone speaks, so speech stays clear.
- Mic bleed
- When one speaker's microphone picks up another speaker, which multitrack processing can reduce.
Key features of Auphonic
Intelligent levelling
Noise and reverb reduction
Filler-word and silence cutting
Loudness normalisation
Multitrack mixing
Speech-to-text and show notes
Automatic publishing
API and CLI
Pros & cons
Pros
5- Broadcast-quality polish without an engineer
- Standards-compliant loudness
- Removes tedious editing
- Automation-friendly API and integrations
- Free monthly hours to start
Cons
5- Cannot rescue very poor recordings
- Not for music mastering
- Less manual control than a DAW
- Heavy schedules need paid hours
- Transcripts still need checking
Best For
- Podcast post-production
- Spoken-word video
- Broadcast loudness compliance
- Automated audio workflows
- Multitrack interviews
Auphonic Compared With Editors And Plugins
The useful comparison is with other audio tools, by the kind of audio work each does best.
| Tool | Tool | Focus | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Auphonic | Automatic audio post-production | Levelling, cleanup, loudness, publishing | Podcasts and spoken word |
| AudioCleaner AI | AI audio cleanup | Removing noise from recordings | Quick audio fixes |
| LANDR | Music platform | AI mastering and distribution | Musicians |
| AssemblyAI | Speech-to-text API | Transcription at scale | Developers |
Should Auphonic Master Your Audio?
Podcasters Auphonic Serves Well
- Podcasters wanting consistent sound
- Radio and broadcast producers
- Video creators with spoken content
- Teams automating production via API or watch folders
- Organisations publishing regular audio
When Auphonic Is Not The Audio Fix You Need
- Music production and mastering
- Sound design and creative audio work
- Anyone needing manual control of every edit
- Recordings too damaged to rescue
- Those expecting software to replace a good mic
What Auphonic's Site And Docs State
Last checked . Read from auphonic.com during this check, with the screenshot above captured at the same time.
- An AI audio post-production service
- Intelligent levelling between speakers, music and speech
- Noise and reverb reduction, de-esser, de-plosive and clipping repair
- Automatic cutting of filler words, coughs and silences
- Loudness targets and true-peak settings
- Multitrack processing with ducking and mic-bleed removal
- Speech-to-text, show notes, chapters and video podcasts
- Publishing integrations, API, CLI, watch folders and Zapier
- Free processing hours each month, then paid
- No prices reproduced here, in line with this site's pricing policy
Auphonic polishes and standardises audio but cannot fully rescue poor recordings. User figures are vendor-stated; judge it on your own episodes.
Audio Tools To Weigh Beside Auphonic
A music platform, an audio cleanup tool and a transcription API to weigh alongside Auphonic.
- LANDR — music mastering and distribution
- AudioCleaner AI — quick AI audio cleanup
- AssemblyAI — speech-to-text for developers
Editor's Verdict
4.3/5Auphonic earns 4.3 as one of the most practical tools a spoken-word creator can use: it automatically levels speakers and music, removes noise, reverb, filler words and silences, meets loudness standards, mixes multitrack recordings, transcribes and publishes, with an API and integrations for automated workflows. Free monthly hours make it easy to test. It cannot rescue badly recorded audio or replace a music mastering engineer, but for podcasts and spoken video it delivers polish and consistency for very little effort. AInexfinder Editor Score: 4.3/5.
Auphonic pricing
AInexfinder does not list plan prices or billing details. For current pricing, plans, and trials, visit the official Auphonic website.
Visit official website for pricingVendor pricing, credits, and billing policies change over time. Always confirm on the official site before you buy.
Frequently asked questions
What is Auphonic?
Can Auphonic remove filler words?
Does Auphonic meet podcast loudness standards?
Can Auphonic process multiple tracks?
Is Auphonic free?
Does Auphonic make transcripts?
Can Auphonic publish my episodes?
Can developers automate Auphonic?
Who is Auphonic best for?
Can Auphonic fix a bad recording?
Reviews
Log in to write a review.
User Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience with Auphonic.
Reviewed by Daniel Reed
Assigned reviewer
Daniel ReedSenior AI Tools Reviewer
Daniel reviews AI tools the slow way — by actually using them on real projects. His reviews cover what works, what breaks, and who each tool is genuinely a good fit for.
Daniel and the AInexfinder editorial team research Auphonic using public product information, listing evidence, and (when available) hands-on checks. Scores reflect listing completeness and transparency — not paid placement.
- Last verified
- Methodology
- How we review AI tools
- Sources used
- auphonic.com
- AInexfinder listing fields (features, pros/cons, description)
- Public vendor pages when available
- Editorial policy
- Listings may include affiliate or sponsored placements, which are labeled when present. Editorial scores and cons are not sold. See our affiliate disclosure and review methodology.



