PayPerVideo

Independent reseller. PayPerVideo is not operated by or affiliated with Google, Runway, Kuaishou, Alibaba or xAI. It sells access to those companies' video models through its own interface, and the model names are trademarks of their respective owners.

Every serious AI video generator now sells a monthly plan, and every monthly plan assumes you make video every month. If you need four clips for a campaign in March and nothing until August, that assumption costs you real money for months of nothing.

PayPerVideo is built on the opposite assumption. There is no plan and no renewal — you buy single-use generation codes, each one good for one ten-second 1080p clip from whichever of six models you pick, and the codes sit in your account until you want them.

What it is not is a model of its own. Everything it generates comes from Google's Veo, Runway, Kling, Vidu, Seedance or xAI's Grok, the same engines you could reach directly through Runway ML or Google Veo. What you are buying is the billing model, not the technology.

PayPerVideo Specifications At A Glance

PayPerVideo In Five Quick Points

• The pitch: premium video models without a subscription — you buy codes, one code makes one clip, and unused codes do not lapse.
• The catalogue: six engines in one interface, including Veo 3.1, Runway, Kling and Grok, so you can match the engine to the shot rather than to your plan.
• The hard ceiling: ten seconds, 1080p. That covers a social hook or a product beat and rules out anything with a narrative arc.
• The risk to weigh: every package is non-refundable and there is no free clip, so your first code is also your first test of whether the output suits you.
• The gap in the record: the site publishes terms, privacy and contact pages but does not name the company behind it — see the verification note at the foot of this page.

What Are You Buying From PayPerVideo?

A code. That is the whole product, and understanding it prevents the most common disappointment: PayPerVideo did not build a video model and does not claim to. It has built a storefront and a generation interface on top of six models other companies train and operate.

That is a legitimate thing to sell. Reaching Veo, Runway and Kling directly means three accounts, three billing relationships and three monthly commitments, and for someone who wants four clips a year that overhead dwarfs the actual generation cost. Consolidating them behind one purchase is a real service.

It does mean two things worth holding onto. Your output quality is entirely the upstream model's, so a PayPerVideo clip is a Veo clip or a Kling clip — nothing here improves or degrades it. And if an upstream provider changes terms or pricing, that reaches you through a reseller you have no contract with.

Each code allows the creation of 1 AI video with any model in 1080p HD. — PayPerVideo pricing page, September 2026

Which Video Models Can You Choose From?

Six, and they are not interchangeable. The platform's own framing — pick the engine that suits the shot — is the right way to use it, but only if you know what each engine is actually good at, and the site does not tell you in any depth.

A rough map, based on what these models are generally known for rather than on anything PayPerVideo publishes:

• Veo 3.1 — Google's model, the strongest general-purpose choice for photoreal motion and camera movement.
• Runway — the most established in creative and film workflows, with a distinctive handling of motion and style.
• Kling — strong on human movement and physical plausibility, widely used for figure and product work.
• Grok — xAI's engine, the newest of the group and the least documented for video work.
• Seedance and Vidu — faster, lighter engines, useful for drafting an idea before spending a code on a heavier model.

Who Runs The Models Behind The Platform

Google, Runway, Kuaishou, Alibaba and xAI, respectively — none of whom are PayPerVideo. This matters for expectations more than anything else. Capability questions, model roadmaps and quality regressions all originate upstream, and a reseller can neither fix them nor warn you in advance.

It also affects recourse. A problem with a generated clip is a support conversation with PayPerVideo, not with Google, and PayPerVideo's own terms mark purchases non-refundable. Weigh that before buying a large pack.

How The Code System Works, Step By Step

The flow is deliberately short, and the only irreversible moment is the purchase. Everything after that is a normal prompt-and-generate loop.

1. Browse the gallery first, without buying anything. The sample clips are labelled with the engine that produced them, which is the closest thing to a free trial on offer.
2. Decide your aspect ratio before you write a prompt — 16:9, 9:16 or 1:1. A vertical hook and a landscape product beat are different shots, not the same shot cropped.
3. Buy the smallest package that covers your test. Packs cost less per clip, but a pack you bought before knowing whether the output suits you is the expensive option, not the cheap one.
4. Write the prompt somewhere you can edit it, not in the generation box. You will want to iterate the wording, and each generation spends a code.
5. Pick the engine deliberately, using a light model for a first draft of the idea and a heavier one for the clip you will actually publish.
6. Generate, and expect roughly a minute. The site quotes about 60 seconds in one place and one to three minutes in another, so plan for the longer figure.
7. Pass/fail step: play the result at full size with sound off and watch hands, text, faces and any straight edge in the background. If the clip fails on detail you would have to explain to a client, buying more codes will not fix it — that is the upstream model's ceiling, and you should test a different engine before spending again.

What Does A Ten-Second Ceiling Rule Out?

Ten seconds is a shot, not a scene. It is enough for a social hook, a product reveal, a loop for a landing page, or one beat of a montage — and that covers a great deal of what AI video is actually used for commercially.

What it does not cover is anything that needs to develop. A testimonial with a beginning and an end, an explainer that walks through three points, a tutorial that demonstrates a process — all of these need either multiple codes and an editor to stitch them, or a different tool entirely.

The site markets explainer and tutorial use cases prominently, which is the one place its framing outruns its specification. You can build an explainer here, but you will be buying several codes and assembling the result yourself, and nothing on the page says so.

• Comfortable: social hooks, product beats, ad variations for testing, background loops, style tests before a real shoot.
• Possible with assembly: explainers and UGC-style spots, cut together from several ten-second clips in a video editor.
• Out of reach: anything needing continuity of character or setting across a cut, since each generation is independent of the last.
• Wrong tool: talking-head presenters and scripted spokesperson video, where an avatar platform such as HeyGen is built for the job.

How PayPerVideo Charges, And What Never Expires

One code, one clip, any model — the unit is simple and does not vary by engine, which is unusual and works in your favour if you pick the heavier models. Codes are sold individually and in packs, with the per-clip figure falling as the pack grows.

Two properties make the model genuinely different from credits elsewhere. Codes carry no expiry, so a pack bought in one campaign is still there for the next one, and there is no renewal to cancel or forget. AInexfinder does not publish plan amounts because vendor pricing moves without notice — the pricing page is the current source.

The property working against you is refunds. Every package is marked non-refundable, and there is no free generation, so the only way to find out whether the output meets your standard is to buy. Start with a single code even though it is the worst per-clip figure on the page; the pack discount is not a saving if the output does not suit you.

The Non-Refundable Clause Worth Reading First

It appears on every package, in the feature list, alongside the benefits. That is more upfront than burying it in the terms, and the vendor deserves credit for the placement.

The practical consequence is that PayPerVideo inverts the usual risk. A subscription lets you try a month and leave; here you commit first and evaluate afterwards. Where a statutory right of withdrawal applies to you as a consumer, it applies regardless of what a product page says — but do not plan around it.