
Zapier's AI layer adds agents and MCP tool access on top of its automation platform, connecting more than 9,000 apps with governed access so teams can mix AI decisions with deterministic rules under central oversight.
Productivity & Automation Review
Activepieces is an open-source (MIT) workspace for AI agents and visual automation flows connecting 760+ apps, with a flow builder, MCP server, approval gates, and enterprise features (SSO, RBAC, your own secret manager, audit logs, self-hosting). It suits teams wanting automation they can self-host and inspect, with the usual considerations that automations touching money or customers need controls, which it is built around.

Very good
Activepieces earns 4.2 as a strong, genuinely open-source automation platform that pairs AI agents with a Zapier-style visual flow builder across 760+ apps, and lets you self-host, inspect and control it rather than depend on a closed cloud. The MIT licensing, broad app coverage, MCP server, and enterprise controls, SSO, RBAC, your own secret manager, audit logs and human-approval gates, make it compelling for teams that value ownership and security. The considerations are the category's, and it's built to meet them: automations that touch money, customers or production need the approval gates and testing, AI agents need oversight, and a self-hosted instance is yours to run and secure. For teams wanting capable, controllable, no-lock-in automation it's an excellent choice; those wanting only the simplest managed SaaS may prefer a closed tool. AInexfinder Editor Score: 4.2/5.
Best for: AI agents and automation; Self-hosted automation
The visit link goes to activepieces.com, the official site. Paid placements on AInexfinder are always labelled. How we make money
Automation tools are powerful but often closed, cloud-only, and nervous-making once a flow can move money or touch customers. Activepieces' pitch is a different footing: open-source AI agents and automation you can self-host, inspect and control.
It pairs plain-language AI agents with a visual flow builder across 760+ apps, an MCP server and human-approval gates, plus enterprise security. It sits among automation tools like Make, at the open-source end.
This review covers how Activepieces automates work, which teams it suits, how it's licensed and priced, and the control considerations to weigh first.
Activepieces' core job is to automate work across your apps, the way Zapier or Make do, but as open-source software you can run yourself. It pairs a visual flow builder (branching, retries, waitpoints, subflows, error handling, inline TypeScript) with plain-language AI agents, connecting 760+ apps via 'pieces', with an HTTP piece for any REST/GraphQL API.
The open-source footing is the differentiator: every piece is MIT-licensed, the project is public (with a large GitHub following), and you can deploy on the cloud, your own infrastructure, or even air-gapped, which matters to teams that can't or won't put their automations in someone else's closed cloud.
For organisations it adds the controls automation at scale needs, Okta/Entra SSO with RBAC, your own secret manager (e.g. HashiCorp Vault), audit logs to your SIEM, bring-your-own AI keys, and crucially human-approval gates for steps that 'touch money, customers, or production'.
The honest framing is that Activepieces is a strong, genuinely open-source automation platform, and the combination of AI agents, broad app coverage, self-hosting and enterprise controls is compelling. The considerations are the category's, and it's built to meet them: automations that move money, message customers or change production are powerful and risky, so use the approval gates, test flows before trusting them, and keep credentials in the vault rather than hard-coded. AI agents acting autonomously especially need oversight. Being open-source, the running and securing of a self-hosted instance is on you. Its claims are vendor-stated, though the open code helps you verify them.
Activepieces is a strong, genuinely open-source automation platform with AI agents and enterprise controls; automations that touch money or customers need its approval gates and testing.
Activepieces pairs a visual flow builder and AI agents with open-source self-hosting.
A flow builder with branching, retries and approvals connects 760+ apps, and AI agents handle plain-language tasks.
A platform like Make is a powerful closed-cloud automator; Activepieces' angle is open-source and self-hostable, so you can inspect and run it yourself, which is the key difference.
It's MIT-licensed with an MCP server, and deploys on cloud, your infra or air-gapped.
An agent platform like Relevance AI is managed and low-code; Activepieces leans open-source and self-hostable, so match it to whether you want to own the stack, and keep approval gates on risky steps.
Activepieces suits teams across a company, marketing, sales, support, ops, finance, and engineering/IT, that want to automate workflows and AI-agent tasks, especially those who value open source and self-hosting.
It suits organisations with data-residency, security or no-lock-in requirements that want to run automation on their own infrastructure with enterprise controls, and developers who'll contribute pieces or extend it.
It suits less well non-technical individuals wanting the simplest possible closed SaaS, teams who won't maintain a self-hosted instance (though cloud is offered), and anyone who'd let AI agents act on money or customers without approval gates.
A fair way to place it: if you want capable automation plus AI agents that you can self-host, inspect and control, Activepieces is an excellent, no-lock-in choice, provided you use its approval gates and controls on risky steps; if you just want the simplest managed tool and don't value open source, a closed SaaS may be simpler, which is a question of priorities. If your main need is specifically AI-agent workflows rather than broad app automation, a builder like Sim is worth a look too; Activepieces' edge is pairing agent workflows with open-source, self-hostable automation across hundreds of apps.
Activepieces is open-source (MIT) with a free plan (no credit card), self-hosting (cloud, your infra or air-gapped) and a 'talk to sales' enterprise tier. We do not publish prices; the open-source core is free to self-host, with cloud and enterprise priced separately.
The value question isn't licence cost (the core is free and open) but operating model: self-hosting means you bear the infrastructure and maintenance, while the cloud/enterprise tiers trade that for a fee and support.
The sensible approach is to try the free/open version on a real workflow, test agents and flows with approval gates before trusting them, decide between self-hosting and cloud for your team, and scale to enterprise only once it fits.
Because automations can touch money and agents act, build one flow with controls first.
| What it is | Open-source AI agents + automation flows |
|---|---|
| Company | Activepieces (no further legal entity named) |
| Core | Visual flow builder across 760+ apps, plus AI agents |
| AI | Plain-language agents; Chat; Knowledge Base; MCP server |
| Control | Branching, retries, waitpoints, human approvals, inline TypeScript |
| Enterprise | SSO (Okta/Entra), RBAC, own secret manager, audit logs; BYO AI keys |
| Access | Freemium + self-host (cloud/your infra/air-gapped) + sales |
| License | Open source (MIT); 760+ pieces MIT-licensed |
Visual flow builder
AI agents
760+ pieces
MCP server
Human-approval gates
Inline TypeScript
SSO & RBAC
Self-hosting
The useful comparison is with other automation and agent tools.
| Tool | Tool | Approach | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Activepieces | Open-source automation + agents | Self-host or cloud | Teams wanting control |
| Make | Closed-cloud automation | Visual workflows | Ops automation |
| Relevance AI | Managed agent platform | Low-code agents | Business teams |
| Sim | AI workflow builder | Agent workflows | Builders |
Last checked . Read from activepieces.com during this check, with the screenshot above captured at the same time.
Activepieces is built to meet the category's duties: automations that move money, message customers or change production are powerful and risky, so use the human-approval gates, test flows before trusting them, and keep credentials in the secret manager. AI agents acting autonomously especially need oversight. Being open-source (MIT), running and securing a self-hosted instance is on you; the open code helps verify its claims. Claims are vendor-stated.
A closed-cloud automator, a managed agent platform and a workflow builder to weigh beside Activepieces.
AInexfinder does not list plan prices or billing details. For current pricing, plans, and trials, visit the official Activepieces website.
Visit official website for pricingVendor pricing, credits, and billing policies change over time. Always confirm on the official site before you buy.
Activepieces earns an AInexfinder Editor Score of 4.2/5 (very good). Best for: AI agents and automation; Self-hosted automation; No-lock-in workflows.
Visit ActivepiecesLog in to write a review.
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience with Activepieces.
Assigned reviewer
Daniel ReedSenior AI Tools Reviewer
Daniel leads AInexfinder's tool reviews. He researches each tool from its own pricing, documentation and policies, checks its claims against independent sources, and writes up what it does well, where it falls short and who it genuinely suits.
Daniel and the AInexfinder editorial team research Activepieces from its own website, pricing, documentation and policies, checked against independent sources. This review is research-based: unless its method note says otherwise, we have not bought a plan or run hands-on tests. The Editor Score is our editorial judgement, and payment never changes it.
Related Pages